MySQL的四種不同查詢的分析
1.前置條件:
本次是基于小數(shù)據(jù)量,且數(shù)據(jù)塊在一個(gè)頁中的最理想情況進(jìn)行分析,可能無具體的實(shí)際意義,但是可以借鑒到各種復(fù)雜條件下,因?yàn)樵硎窍嗤?知小見大,見微知著!
打開語句分析并確認(rèn)是否已經(jīng)打開
- mysql> set profiling=1;
- Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
- mysql> select @@profiling;
- +-------------+
- | @@profiling |
- +-------------+
- | 1 |
- +-------------+
- 1 row in set (0.01 sec)
2.數(shù)據(jù)準(zhǔn)備:
2.1全表掃描數(shù)據(jù)
- create table person4all(id int not null auto_increment, name varchar(30) not null, gender varchar(10) not null ,primary key(id));
- insert into person4all(name,gender) values("zhaoming","male");
- insert into person4all(name,gender) values("wenwen","female");
2.2根據(jù)主鍵查看數(shù)據(jù)
- create table person4pri(id int not null auto_increment, name varchar(30) not null, gender varchar(10) not null ,primary key(id));
- insert into person4pri(name,gender) values("zhaoming","male");
- insert into person4pri(name,gender) values("wenwen","female");
2.3根據(jù)非聚集索引查數(shù)據(jù)
- create table person4index(id int not null auto_increment, name varchar(30) not null, gender varchar(10) not null ,primary key(id) , index(gender));
- insert into person4index(name,gender) values("zhaoming","male");
- insert into person4index(name,gender) values("wenwen","female");
2.4根據(jù)覆蓋索引查數(shù)據(jù)
- create table person4cindex(id int not null auto_increment, name varchar(30) not null, gender varchar(10) not null ,primary key(id) , index(name,gender));
- insert into person4cindex(name,gender) values("zhaoming","male");
- insert into person4cindex(name,gender) values("wenwen","female");
主要從以下幾個(gè)方面分析:查詢消耗的時(shí)間,走的執(zhí)行計(jì)劃等方面。
3.開工測試:
第一步:全表掃描
- mysql> select * from person4all ;
- +----+----------+--------+
- | id | name | gender |
- +----+----------+--------+
- | 1 | zhaoming | male |
- | 2 | wenwen | female |
- +----+----------+--------+
- 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
查看其執(zhí)行計(jì)劃:
- mysql> explain select * from person4all;
- +----+-------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------+
- | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
- +----+-------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------+
- | 1 | SIMPLE | person4all | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 2 | |
- +----+-------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------+
- 1 row in set (0.01 sec)
我們可以很清晰的看到走的是全表掃描,而沒有走索引!
查詢消耗的時(shí)間:
- mysql> show profiles;
- +----------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | Query_ID | Duration | Query |
- | 54 | 0.00177300 | select * from person4all |
- | 55 | 0.00069200 | explain select * from person4all |
- +----------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
全表掃描總共話了0.0017730秒
各個(gè)階段消耗的時(shí)間是:
- mysql> show profile for query 54;
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- | Status | Duration |
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- | starting | 0.000065 |
- | checking query cache for query | 0.000073 |
- | Opening tables | 0.000037 |
- | System lock | 0.000024 |
- | Table lock | 0.000053 |
- | init | 0.000044 |
- | optimizing | 0.000022 |
- | statistics | 0.000032 |
- | preparing | 0.000030 |
- | executing | 0.000020 |
- | Sending data | 0.001074 |
- | end | 0.000091 |
- | query end | 0.000020 |
- | freeing items | 0.000103 |
- | storing result in query cache | 0.000046 |
- | logging slow query | 0.000019 |
- | cleaning up | 0.000020 |
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- 17 rows in set (0.00 sec)
第一次不走緩存的話,需要檢查是否存在緩存中,打開表,初始化等操作,最大的開銷在于返回?cái)?shù)據(jù)。
第二步:根據(jù)主鍵查詢數(shù)據(jù)。
- mysql> select name ,gender from person4pri where id in (1,2);
- +----------+--------+
- | name | gender |
- +----------+--------+
- | zhaoming | male |
- | wenwen | female |
- +----------+--------+
- 2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
查看其執(zhí)行計(jì)劃:
- mysql> explain select name ,gender from person4pri where id in (1,2);
- +----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+-------------+
- | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
- +----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+-------------+
- | 1 | SIMPLE | person4pri | range | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | NULL | 2 | Using where |
- +----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+-------------+
- 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
從執(zhí)行計(jì)劃中我們可以看出,走的是范圍索引。
再看其執(zhí)行消耗的時(shí)間:
- mysql> show profiles;
- +----------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | Query_ID | Duration | Query |
- +----------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | 63 | 0.00135700 | select name ,gender from person4pri where id in (1,2) |
- | 64 | 0.00079200 | explain select name ,gender from person4pri where id in (1,2) |
- +----------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- 15 rows in set (0.01 sec)
這次查詢消耗時(shí)間為0.00079200。
查看各個(gè)階段消耗的時(shí)間:
- mysql> show profile for query 63;
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- | Status | Duration |
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- | starting | 0.000067 |
- | checking query cache for query | 0.000146 |
- | Opening tables | 0.000342 |
- | System lock | 0.000027 |
- | Table lock | 0.000115 |
- | init | 0.000056 |
- | optimizing | 0.000032 |
- | statistics | 0.000069 |
- | preparing | 0.000039 |
- | executing | 0.000022 |
- | Sending data | 0.000100 |
- | end | 0.000075 |
- | query end | 0.000022 |
- | freeing items | 0.000158 |
- | storing result in query cache | 0.000045 |
- | logging slow query | 0.000019 |
- | cleaning up | 0.000023 |
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- 17 rows in set (0.00 sec)
看出最大的消耗也是在Sending data,第一次也是需要一些初始化操作。
第三步:根據(jù)非聚集索引查詢
- mysql> select name ,gender from person4index where gender in ("male","female");
- +----------+--------+
- | name | gender |
- +----------+--------+
- | wenwen | female |
- | zhaoming | male |
- +----------+--------+
- 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
查看器執(zhí)行計(jì)劃:
- mysql> explain select name ,gender from person4index where gender in ("male","female");
- +----+-------------+--------------+-------+---------------+--------+---------+------+------+-------------+
- | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
- +----+-------------+--------------+-------+---------------+--------+---------+------+------+-------------+
- | 1 | SIMPLE | person4index | range | gender | gender | 12 | NULL | 2 | Using where |
- +----+-------------+--------------+-------+---------------+--------+---------+------+------+-------------+
- 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
可以看出,走的也是范圍索引。同主鍵查詢,那么就看其消耗時(shí)間了
- mysql> show profiles;
- +----------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | Query_ID | Duration | Query |
- +----------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | 68 | 0.00106600 | select name ,gender from person4index where gender in ("male","female") |
- | 69 | 0.00092500 | explain select name ,gender from person4index where gender in ("male","female") |
- +----------+------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- 15 rows in set (0.00 sec)
這個(gè)非主鍵索引消耗的時(shí)間為:0.00106600,可以看出略大于組件索引消耗的時(shí)間。
看其具體消耗的階段:
- mysql> show profile for query 68 ;
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- | Status | Duration |
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- | starting | 0.000059 |
- | checking query cache for query | 0.000111 |
- | Opening tables | 0.000085 |
- | System lock | 0.000023 |
- | Table lock | 0.000067 |
- | init | 0.000183 |
- | optimizing | 0.000031 |
- | statistics | 0.000139 |
- | preparing | 0.000035 |
- | executing | 0.000020 |
- | Sending data | 0.000148 |
- | end | 0.000024 |
- | query end | 0.000019 |
- | freeing items | 0.000043 |
- | storing result in query cache | 0.000042 |
- | logging slow query | 0.000017 |
- | cleaning up | 0.000020 |
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- 17 rows in set (0.00 sec)
看幾個(gè)關(guān)鍵詞的點(diǎn);init,statistics,Sending data 這幾個(gè)關(guān)鍵點(diǎn)上的消耗向比較主鍵的查詢要大很多,特別是Sending data。因?yàn)槿羰亲叩姆蔷奂饕?,那么就需要回表進(jìn)行再進(jìn)行一次查詢,多消耗一次IO。
第四部:根據(jù)覆蓋索引查詢數(shù)據(jù)
- mysql> select gender ,name from person4cindex where gender in ("male","female");
- +--------+----------+
- | gender | name |
- +--------+----------+
- | female | wenwen |
- | male | zhaoming |
- +--------+----------+
- 2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
這里需要注意的是,我的字段查詢順序變了,是gender,name而不在是前面的name,gender,這樣是為了走覆蓋索引。具體看效果吧
還是先看執(zhí)行計(jì)劃:
- mysql> explain select gender ,name from person4cindex where gender in ("male","female");
- +----+-------------+---------------+-------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+--------------------------+
- | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
- +----+-------------+---------------+-------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+--------------------------+
- | 1 | SIMPLE | person4cindex | index | NULL | name | 44 | NULL | 2 | Using where; Using index |
- +----+-------------+---------------+-------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+--------------------------+
- 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
最后欄Extra中表示走的就是覆蓋索引。
看消耗的時(shí)間吧:
- mysql> show profiles;
- +----------+------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | Query_ID | Duration | Query |
- +----------+------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | 83 | 0.00115400 | select gender ,name from person4cindex where gender in ("male","female") |
- | 84 | 0.00074000 | explain select gender ,name from person4cindex where gender in ("male","female") |
- +----------+------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
我們看到消耗的時(shí)間是0.00115400,看這個(gè)數(shù)字好像挺高的,那么都花在什么地方了呢?
看下具體的消耗情況:
- mysql> show profile for query 83 ;
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- | Status | Duration |
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- | starting | 0.000083 |
- | checking query cache for query | 0.000113 |
- | Opening tables | 0.000039 |
- | System lock | 0.000026 |
- | Table lock | 0.000075 |
- | init | 0.000128 |
- | optimizing | 0.000193 |
- | statistics | 0.000056 |
- | preparing | 0.000038 |
- | executing | 0.000021 |
- | Sending data | 0.000121 |
- | end | 0.000042 |
- | query end | 0.000021 |
- | freeing items | 0.000112 |
- | storing result in query cache | 0.000043 |
- | logging slow query | 0.000021 |
- | cleaning up | 0.000022 |
- +--------------------------------+----------+
- 17 rows in set (0.00 sec)
很驚奇吧,在初始化和優(yōu)化上消耗了這么多時(shí)間,取數(shù)據(jù)基恩差不多。
總 結(jié):
有了上面這些數(shù)據(jù),那么我們整理下吧。未存在緩存下的數(shù)據(jù)。
看這個(gè)表,全表掃描最慢,我們可以理解,同時(shí)主鍵查詢比覆蓋所有掃描慢也還能接受,但是為什么主鍵掃描會比非主鍵掃描慢?而且非主鍵查詢需要消耗的1次查詢的io+一次回表的查詢IO,理論上是要比主鍵掃描慢,而出來的數(shù)據(jù)缺不是如此。那么就仔細(xì)看下是個(gè)查詢方式在各個(gè)主要階段消耗的時(shí)間吧。
查詢是否存在緩存,打開表及鎖表這些操作時(shí)間是差不多,我們不會計(jì)入。具體還是看init,optimizing等環(huán)節(jié)消耗的時(shí)間。
1.從這個(gè)表中,我們看到非主鍵索引和覆蓋索引在準(zhǔn)備時(shí)間上需要開銷很多的時(shí)間,預(yù)估這兩種查詢方式都需要進(jìn)行回表操作,所以花在準(zhǔn)備上更多時(shí)間。
2.第二項(xiàng)optimizing上,可以清晰知道,覆蓋索引話在優(yōu)化上大量的時(shí)間,這樣在二級索引上就無需回表。
3. Sendingdata,全表掃描慢就慢在這一項(xiàng)上,因?yàn)槭羌虞d所有的數(shù)據(jù)頁,所以花費(fèi)在這塊上時(shí)間較大,其他三者都差不多。
4. 非主鍵查詢話在freeingitems上時(shí)間最少,那么可以看出它在讀取數(shù)據(jù)塊的時(shí)候最少。
5.相比較主鍵查詢和非主鍵查詢,非主鍵查詢在Init,statistics都遠(yuǎn)高于主鍵查詢,只是在freeingitems開銷時(shí)間比主鍵查詢少。因?yàn)檫@里測試數(shù)據(jù)比較少,但是我們可以預(yù)見在大數(shù)據(jù)量的查詢上,不走緩存的話,那么主鍵查詢的速度是要快于非主鍵查詢的,本次數(shù)據(jù)不過是太小體現(xiàn)不出差距而已。
6.在大多數(shù)情況下,全表掃描還是要慢于索引掃描的。
tips:
過程中的輔助命令:
1.清楚緩存
reset query cache ;
flush tables;
2.查看表的索引:
show index from tablename;
原文鏈接:http://inter12.iteye.com/blog/1430144
【編輯推薦】